“Tatay Digong” as Prototypical, Political Metaphor: A Content Analysis of Senator Bong Go’s Prayer Rally Speech on March 15, 2025, at Liwasang Bonifacio, Manila

Authors

  • Willies Winsor Gutierrez Gabitan Department of English and Comparative Literature, University of the Philippines-Dilima Author

Keywords:

Duterte, Tatay Digong, familial metaphors, Conceptual Metaphor Theory, Prototype Theory, ICC investigation

Abstract

This study examines the metaphorical framing of former Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte as “Tatay Digong” in Senator Bong Go’s prayer rally speech amid Duterte’s International Criminal Court (ICC) investigation. Drawing on Conceptual Metaphor Theory (Lakoff & Johnson, 1980) and Prototype Theory of Meaning (Allan, 2015), the analysis explores how familial metaphors recontextualize political leadership through culturally embedded notions of Filipino fatherhood. A qualitative content analysis of Go’s speech reveals recurring rhetorical patterns of paternal care, sacrificial suffering, and moral obligation, positioning Duterte not as a politician facing legal scrutiny but as a vulnerable patriarch deserving loyalty. Themes of familial framing, emotional blackmail through loyalty, and religious and moral sacralization illustrate how the “tatay” metaphor transforms legal accountability into an affective and moral narrative. Rather than making broad claims about public perception, this study highlights how such metaphors create interpretive scenarios that can obscure institutional processes by reframing governance as kinship. By situating Duterte’s “tatay” persona within both Philippine cultural values and broader Southeast Asian populist traditions, the findings underscore the political power of familial metaphors in legitimizing authority and insulating leaders from critique. Future research could extend this approach by analyzing similar metaphors in other political speeches or digital discourse, offering comparative insights into how familial frames sustain affective loyalty in populist regimes

References

Alampay, L. P. (2013). Parenting in the Philippines. In H. Selin (Ed.), Parenting across cultures: Childrearing, motherhood and fatherhood in non-Western cultures (pp. 105–121). Springer Netherlands.

Allan, K. (2015). A history of semantics. In N. Riemer (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of

semantics (pp. 48–68). Routledge.

Aquino, N. (2019, July 22). Tatay Digong thrives on pathos to keep rock-star status.

BusinessWorld. https://www.bworldonline.com/editors-picks/2019/07/22/243481/tatay-digong-thrives-on-pathos-to-keep-rock-star-status/

Aspinall, E., & Mietzner, M. (2019). Southeast Asia’s troubling elections: Nondemocratic

pluralism in Indonesia. Journal of Democracy, 30(4), 104–118. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2019.0055

Barthes, R. (1972). Mythologies (A. Lavers, Trans.). Hill and Wang.

Camroux, D. (2022). Tatay (Daddy) Digong, The Punisher: President Rodrigo Duterte’s punitive populism in the Philippines. In M. Demertzis & H. Knutsen (Eds.), Contemporary populists in power (pp. 171–191). Springer.

Canovan, M. (1999). Trust the people! Populism and the two faces of democracy. Political

Studies, 47(1), 2–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00184

Charteris-Black, J. (2011). Politicians and rhetoric: The persuasive power of metaphor (2nd ed.).

Palgrave Macmillan.

Get Real Philippines. (2017, July 23). It’s time Duterte’s supporters grow up and stop referring to him as Tatay. Get Real Philippines. https://www.getrealphilippines.com/2017/07/time-dutertes-supporters-grow-stop-referring-tatay/

Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.

Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press.

Mamunta, A. F. C. (2022). Tatay Digong, Ka-DDS, and sakop: Filipino populism under Duterte in the light of Leonardo Mercado’s sakop. PHAVISMINDA Journal, 21, 155–183.

Moffitt, B. (2016). The global rise of populism: Performance, political style, and representation.

Stanford University Press.

Musolff, A. (2016). Political metaphor analysis: Discourse and scenarios. Bloomsbury

Academic.

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Regalado, P. (2021, October 19). Tatay Digong, Mama Leni: Do Filipinos need parent-family

figures in politics? Spot.ph. https://www.spot.ph/newsfeatures/culture/99660/tatay-digong-mama-leni-do-filipinos-need-parent-family-figures-in-politics-a4832-20211019

Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental

Psychology: General, 104(3), 192–233. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.104.3.192

Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. SAGE Publications.

Thompson, M. R. (2016). Bloodied democracy: Duterte and the death of liberal reformism in the

Philippines. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 35(3), 39–68.

Tugano, A. J. & Santos, M. P. (2022). Ang phallokrasiya ni Duterte sa midya bilang Mang Kanor ng politikang Pilipino The phallocracy of Duterte in media as Mang Kanor of Philippine politics. Talastàsan: A Philippine Journal of Communication and Media Studies, 1(2), 30-49.

Jimenez-David, R. (2017, June 20). Our Tatay Digong. Philippine Daily Inquirer. https://opinion.inquirer.net/104930/our-tatay-digong

Downloads

Published

2025-08-30