Bridging the Confidence-Competence Gap: Assessing Pre-Service Teachers’ Ability to Discern Fake News as Basis for Media Literacy Training Module Development

Authors

Keywords:

fake news, media literacy, pre-service teachers, competence, confidence, training module development

Abstract

This study explored the competence and confidence of pre-service teachers in discerning fake news as empirical bases for the development of a contextualized media literacy training module. Grounded in Information Processing Theory and Media Literacy Theory, the research employed a sequential explanatory mixed-methods design conducted at Cagayan State University, Andrews Campus, specifically within the College of Teacher Education. Fifty-six fourth-year Bachelor of Secondary Education (BSEd) English students were selected through purposive sampling. In the quantitative phase, descriptive statistics were used to determine respondents’ level of competence across six dimensions: headline sensationalism evaluation, content and logical consistency, source credibility and author information, bias and objectivity, visual and media content, and emotional appeal. Results revealed an overall Basic level of competence (M = 3.40), with strengths in emotional appeal and source credibility but significant weaknesses in bias detection and logical consistency. Meanwhile, respondents reported confidence to a great extent across awareness, comprehension, analysis, evaluation, advanced critical thinking, and active engagement domains, indicating a notable confidence–competence gap. The qualitative phase, analyzed through thematic analysis, identified both positive practices (e.g., source verification, cross-checking, contextual evaluation) and malpractices (e.g., reliance on virality, emotional bias, impulsive sharing, superficial trust in visuals). Findings highlighted inconsistencies between perceived ability and actual evaluative performance. Based on these findings, the results will be utilized in planning and developing an evidence-based Media Literacy Training Module aimed at combating fake news. The proposed module will focus on addressing identified competence gaps by strengthening analytical reasoning, ethical information consumption, emotional regulation, and critical engagement, aligned with SDG 4.7 and SDG 16.10. Overall, the study underscores the need for structured, skill-based media literacy interventions in teacher education programs to bridge the confidence–competence gap and prepare future educators to fight misinformation effectively.

References

Alampay, E. G. A. (2020). E-local governance: Revisiting issues and challenges in the use of ICTs for citizen participation. In Local matters: Experiences in autonomy, decentralization and beyond – A book of readings (Vol. 5, pp. 51–69). Center for Local and Regional Governance, National College of Public Administration and Governance, University of the Philippines.

Aufderheide, P., & Firestone, C. M. (1993). Media literacy: A report of the National Leadership Conference on Media Literacy. Aspen Institute.

Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K. W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 2, pp. 89–195). Academic Press.

Bulger, M., & Davison, P. (2018). The promises, challenges, and futures of media literacy. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 10(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.23860/JMLE-2018-10-1-1

Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2009). Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Fazio, L. K. (2020). Repetition increases perceived truth even for known falsehoods. Collabra: Psychology, 6(1), Article 38. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.347

Gray, D. E. (2009). Doing research in the real world (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Guess, A. M., Lockett, D., Lyons, B., Montgomery, J. M., Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2020). “Fake news” may have limited effects beyond increasing beliefs in false claims. Harvard Kennedy School (HKS) Misinformation Review, 1(1) 1-12. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-004

Hobbs, R. (2020). Media literacy. In R. Hobbs (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of media literacy (pp. 67-68). Wiley-Blackwell.

Kahne, J., & Bowyer, B. (2017). Educating for democracy in a partisan age: Confronting the challenges of motivated reasoning and misinformation. American Educational Research Journal, 54(1), 3–34. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216679817

Kahne, J., & Bowyer, B. (2019). Can media literacy education increase students’ skepticism of fake news? Learning, Media and Technology, 44(2), 211–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2019.1601108

Lazer, D. M. J., Baum, M. A., Benkler, Y., Berinsky, A. J., Greenhill, K. M., Menczer, F., & Schudson, M. (2018). The science of fake news. Science, 359(6380), 1094–1096. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao2998

Martel, C., Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2020). Reliance on emotion promotes belief in fake news. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-020-00252-3

McGrew, S., Breakstone, J., Ortega, T., Smith, M., & Wineburg, S. (2018). Can students evaluate online sources? Learning from assessments of civic online reasoning. Theory & Research in Social Education, 46(2), 165–193. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2017.1416320

Metzger, M. J., & Flanagin, A. J. (2015). Psychological approaches to credibility assessment online. In S. S. Sundar (Ed.), The handbook of the psychology of communication technology (pp. 445–466). Wiley-Blackwell.

Metzger, MJ., Flanagin, A. J.,& Medders, R. B. (2021). Social and heuristic approaches to credibility evaluation online. Journal of Communication, 60(3), 413–439.

Paris, B., & Donovan, J.(2019). Deepfakes and cheap fakes: The manipulation of audio and visual evidence. Data & Society.

Pennycook, G., McPhetres, J., Zhang, Y., Lu, J. G., & Rand, D. G. (2020). Fighting COVID-19 misinformation on social media: Experimental evidence for a scalable accuracy nudge intervention. Psychological Science, 31(7), 770–780. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620939054

Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2021). The psychology of fake news. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(5), 388–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2021.02.007

Porst, R. (2011). Questionnaire design. GESIS—Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences.

Potter, W. J. (2021). Media literacy (9th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Tandoc, E. C., Jr., Jenkins, J., & Craft, S. (2019). Fake news as a critical incident in journalism. Journalism Practice, 13(6), 673–689. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2018.1562958

Tandoc, E. C., Jr., Lim, Z. W., & Ling, R. (2017). Defining “fake news”: A typology of scholarly definitions. Digital Journalism, 6(2), 137–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1360143

Torres, J., & Tapsell, R. (2021). Social media, fake news, and the 2019 elections in the Philippines. Asia Pacific Media Educator, 31(2), 131-148. https://doi.org/10.1177/1326365X211044459

Tully, M., & Vraga, E. K. (2017). Who Experiences Growth in News Media Literacy and Why Does It Matter? Examining Education, Individual Differences, and Democratic Outcomes. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 73(2), 167-181. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077695817706572

Wardle, C., & Derakhshan, H. (2017). Information disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policy making. https://edoc.coe.int/en/media/7495-information-disorder-toward-an-interdisciplinary-framework-for-research-and-policy-making.html

Wineburg, S., McGrew, S., Breakstone, J., & Ortega, T. (2016). Evaluating information: The cornerstone of civic online reasoning. Stanford History Education Group. https://purl.stanford.edu/fv751yt5934

Wineburg, S., & McGrew, S. (2019). Lateral reading and the nature of expertise: Reading less and learning more when evaluating digital information. Teachers College Record, 121(11), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811912101102

Downloads

Published

2026-02-28

Similar Articles

1-10 of 21

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.