Quantifying Data Privacy Proficiency: An Analysis of Data-Sharing Behavior and Data Privacy Concerns among Digital Consumers

Authors

  • Angel D. Leal Isabela State University-Cauayan City Campus Author
  • Marvin L. Ramirez Author

Keywords:

data privacy, digital consumers, data-sharing behavior, privacy paradox, Theory of Planned Behavior

Abstract

In the Philippines, where online transactions and social media usage are widespread, safeguarding digital privacy is crucial for consumer protection. Existing studies have extensively explored data privacy concerns and behaviors in urban and international contexts. However, there is a lack of empirical studies that assess data privacy proficiency and its behavioral determinants among digital consumers in the Philippines, especially in provincial settings such as Cauayan City, Isabela. This study then assessed the data privacy concerns and data-sharing behaviors of digital consumers in Cauayan City. It also sought to determine how attitude, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control influence their intention to share personal data, using the Theory of Planned Behavior as the study framework. A descriptive-correlational research design was employed. A structured questionnaire was administered to 500 respondents who regularly engage in online transactions. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, and multiple regression analysis. Findings indicated that, while consumers are moderately to highly concerned about data privacy, they continue to share personal data such as names, contact information, and addresses on platforms like Facebook, GCash, and Shopee. Results also showed that attitude and subjective norms significantly influence data-sharing intention, while perceived behavioral control has a weaker effect. This reflects the “privacy paradox” phenomenon, where expressed concern does not translate into cautious behavior. This study concludes that digital consumers in Cauayan City demonstrate moderate data privacy proficiency, but their behavior often prioritizes convenience and trust in platforms over caution.

References

Akdeniz, E., Borschewski, K. E., Breuer, J., & Voronin, Y. (2023). Sharing social media data: The role of past experiences, attitudes, norms, and perceived behavioral control. Frontiers in big data, 5, 971974. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2022.971974

Alzaidi, M. S., & Agag, G. (2022). The role of trust and privacy concerns in using social media for e-retail services: The moderating role of COVID-19. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 68, 103042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.103042

Ara, A., Zainol, Z., & Duraisamy, B. (2022). The effects of privacy awareness, security concerns and trust on information sharing in social media among public university students in Selangor. International Business Education Journal, 15(2), 93–110. https://doi.org/10.37134/ibej.Vol15.2.8.2022

Aragon, K. A. P., Cabudoc, M. A. L., Remolin, A. B., & Zamora, Z. M. D. (2024). Analyzing the impact of privacy concerns on consumer behavior. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 8(12), 920–934. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2024.8120077

Atalay, H. N., & Yücel, Ş. (2024). Decoding privacy concerns: the role of perceived risk and benefits in personal health data disclosure. Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique, 82(1), 180. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-024-01416-z

Auxier, B., & Anderson, M. (2021, April 7). Social media use in 2021. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2021/04/07/social-media-use-in-2021/

Azizan, A., Abu Bakar, Z., Abdul Rahman, N., & Masrom, S. (2018). A comparative evaluation of search engines on finding specific domain information on the web. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.33.23471

Azzopardi, L., Nicol, E., Briggs, J., & Moncur, W. (2025, March). Assessing risks in online information sharing. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGIR Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval (CHIIR). https://doi.org/10.1145/3698204.3716447

Bacay, I., Ramirez, R. A., Ramos, F. N., & Grimaldo, J. R. (2022). Factors influencing Shopee users' intention to purchase products during Shopee Philippines' big online shopping events. Journal of Business and Management Studies, 4(2), 27–37. https://doi.org/10.32996/jbms.2022.4.2.3

Barnes, S. B. (2006). A privacy paradox: Social networking in the United States. First Monday, 11(9). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v11i9.1394

Bélanger, N., & Crossler, N. (2011). Privacy in the Digital Age: a Review of Information Privacy Research in Information Systems1. MIS Quarterly, 35(4), 1017-A36. https://doi.org/10.2307/41409971

Belmonte, Z. J. A., Prasetyo, Y. T., Cahigas, M. M., Nadlifatin, R., & Gumasing, M. J. J. (2024). Factors influencing the intention to use e-wallet among generation Z and millennials in the Philippines: An extended technology acceptance model (TAM) approach. Acta Psychologica, 250, 104526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104526

Benson, V., Saridakis, G., & Tennakoon, H. (2015). Information disclosure of social media users. Information Technology and People, 28(3), 426–441. https://doi.org/10.1108/itp-10-2014-0232

Bhandari, P. (2020). Descriptive Statistics | Definitions, Types, Examples. Scribbr. https://www.scribbr.com/statistics/descriptive-statistics/

Biber, M., Louis, W. R., & Smith, J. R. (2024). Predicting online privacy protection for Facebook users with an extended theory of planned behavior. The Journal of Social Psychology, 165(3), 313–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2024.2319177

Binns, R. (2018). Fairness in machine learning: Lessons from political philosophy. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, 81, 1–11. https://proceedings.mlr.press/v81/binns18a.html

Bourgeus, A., Vandercruysse, L., & Verhulst, N. (2024). Understanding contextual expectations for sharing wearables’ data: Insights from a vignette study. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 15, 100443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100443

Büchi, M., Festic, N., & Latzer, M. (2022). The chilling effects of digital dataveillance: A theoretical model and an empirical research agenda. Big Data & Society, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211065368

Büchi, M., Just, N., & Latzer, M. (2017). Caring is not enough: The importance of internet skills for online privacy protection. Information, Communication & Society, 20(8), 1261–1278. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1229001

Chi, H., Hueryren, Y., & Wei-chien, H. (2012). The moderating effect of subjective norm on cloud computing users’ perceived risk and usage intention. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 4(6), 95. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijms.v4n6p95

Craig, M. J. A. (2025). Human–machine communication privacy management, privacy fatigue, and the conditional effects of algorithm awareness on privacy co-ownership in the social media context. Computers in Human Behavior, 173, 108786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2025.108786

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Culnan, M. J., & Armstrong, P. K. (1999). Information privacy concerns, procedural fairness, and impersonal trust: An empirical investigation. Organization Science, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.1.104

Custers, B., et al. (2020). EU Personal Data Protection in Policy and Practice. T.M.C. Asser Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-282-8

Durnell, E., Okabe-Miyamoto, K., Howell, R. T., & Zizi, M. (2020). Online privacy breaches, offline consequences: Construction and validation of the concerns with the protection of informational privacy scale. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 36(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1794626

Gonzales, A. L. (2024, August 21). Filipinos hope to grow income but worry about household finances. Philippine News Agency. https://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1231668

Hajli, N., & Lin, X. (2016). Exploring the security of information sharing on social networking sites: The role of perceived control of information. Journal of Business Ethics, 133, 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2346-x

Ho, S. S., Goh, T. J., & Chuah, A. S. F. (2022). Perceived behavioral control as a moderator: Scientists’ attitude, norms, and willingness to engage the public. PLOS ONE, 17(10), e0275643. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275643

Hsu, C., Liao, Y., Lee, C., & Chan, L. K. (2022). Privacy Concerns and Information Sharing: The perspective of the U-Shaped Curve. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 771278. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.771278

IBM Security. (2020). Cost of a Data Breach Report 2020.

Kim, J., Lee, C., & Elias, T. (2015). Factors affecting information sharing in social networking sites amongst university students. Online Information Review, 39(3), 290–309. https://doi.org/10.1108/oir-01-2015-0022

Komnenic, M. (2025). What Is Data Privacy? Complete Guide for Businesses. https://termly.io/resources/articles/what-is-data-privacy/#what-is-data-privac

Koul, S., Verma, R., & Ajaygopal, K. V. (2025). Stakeholders’ understanding of data privacy: Implications for digital credit consumer. Cogent Business & Management, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2025.2568200

Krasnova, H., Günther, O., Spiekermann, S., & Koroleva, K. (2009). Privacy concerns and identity in online social networks. Identity in the Information Society, 2, 39–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12394-009-0019-1

Magadia, C. (2025, October 8). YouTube strengthens lead as new TV. Philippine Tribune. https://tribune.net.ph/2025/10/08/youtube-strengthens-lead-as-new-tv

Marín, V. I., Carpenter, J. P., & Tur, G. (2020). Pre‐service teachers’ perceptions of social media data privacy policies. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(2), 519–535. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13035

Marín, V. I., Carpenter, J. P., Tur, G., & Williamson-Leadley, S. (2022). Social media and data privacy in education: an international comparative study of perceptions among pre-service teachers. Journal of Computers in Education, 10(4), 769–795. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-022-00243-x

Marwick, A. E. (2023). The Private Is Political: Networked Privacy and Social Media. Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300271652

Mateo, J. (2024, September 19). More Pinoys prefer YouTube for information, entertainment. Philippine Star. https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2024/09/19/2386362/more-pinoys-prefer-youtube-information-entertainment

McBurney, D. H., & White, T. L. (2009). Research methods (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Neves, J., Turel, O., & Oliveira, T. (2024). Privacy concerns in social media use: A fear appeal intervention. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 4(2), 100260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2024.100260

Norberg, P. A., Horne, D. R., & Horne, D. A. (2007). The Privacy Paradox: Personal Information Disclosure Intentions versus Behaviors. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 41(1), 100–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.2006.00070.x

Oesterreich, T. D., Anton, E., Hettler, F. M., et al. (2025). What drives individuals’ trusting intention in digital platforms? An exploratory meta-analysis. Management Review Quarterly, 75, 3615–3667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-024-00477-2

Park, Y. J. (2013). Digital literacy and privacy behavior online. Communication Research, 40(2), 215–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650211418338

Pavlou, P. A. (2003). Consumer Acceptance of Electronic Commerce: Integrating Trust and Risk with the Technology Acceptance Model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7(3), 101–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.2003.11044275

Prince, C., Omrani, N., & Schiavone, F. (2024). Online privacy literacy and users’ information privacy empowerment: The case of GDPR in Europe. Information Technology & People, 37(8), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-05-2023-0467

Rader, E. (2023, August). Data privacy and pluralistic ignorance. In Proceedings of the Nineteenth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS 2023) (pp. 457–471). USENIX Association. https://www.usenix.org/conference/soups2023/presentation/rader

Samaniego, A. (2023, September 22). PhilHealth paralyzed by Medusa ransomware attack. Manila Bulletin. https://mb.com.ph/2023/9/21/phil-health-paralyzed-by-medusa-ransomware-attack

Schmeling, J., al Dakruni, S., & Mergel, I. (2025). Data collaboration in digital government research: A literature review and research agenda. Government Information Quarterly, 42(3), 102063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2025.102063

Shulman, Y., & Meyer, J. (2022). Degrees of perceived control over personal information: Effects of information relevance and levels of processing. IEEE Access, 10, 40596–40608. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3167025

Solove, D. J. (2004). The Digital Person: Technology and Privacy in the Information Age (Vol. 1). NYU Press.

Spanaki, K., Karafili, E., & Despoudi, S. (2021). AI applications of data sharing in agriculture 4.0: A framework for role-based data access control. International Journal of Information Management, 59, 102350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102350

Stallings, W. (2020). Handling of personal information and deidentified, aggregated, and pseudonymized information under the California Consumer Privacy Act. IEEE Security & Privacy, 18(1), 61–64. https://doi.org/10.1109/msec.2019.2953324

Tobin, D. (2024). What is Data Privacy—and Why Is It Important? Integrate.io. https://www.integrate.io/blog/what-is-data-privacy-why-is-it-important/

Treiblmaier, H., & Chong, S. (2007). Antecedents of the intention to disclose personal information on the Internet: A review and model extension. In SIGHCI 2007 Proceedings (Article 19). https://aisel.aisnet.org/sighci2007/19

Trepte, S. (2021). The social media privacy model: Privacy and communication in the light of social media affordances. Communication Theory, 31(4), 549–570. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtz035

Uwayezu, E., Tenney, D., & McAdams, A. (2025). Evaluating social media user trade-off between free platform use and privacy concerns of AI-powered targeted advertising. Journal of Business and Economic Studies, 2(3), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.61440/JBES.2025.v2.65

Wang, D. (2019). A study of determinants of teenagers’ privacy protection intentions on social networking sites. The Educational Review, USA. https://doi.org/10.26855/er.2019.10.004

Wang, J., Li, Y., & Rao, R. (2016). Overconfidence in phishing email detection. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 17(11), 759–783. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00442

Winer, R. S. (2001). A Framework for Customer Relationship Management. California Management Review, 43(4), 89-105. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166102

Woetzel, L., Thomas, R., Barquin, S., & Devesa, T. (2021). Future of Asia: The Future of Financial Services. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/financial-services/our-insights/future-of-asia-the-future-of-financial-services

Zacholska-Majer, N. (2025, October). The Gmail Promotions Tab is evolving again! Google is rolling out “Deal Cards,” a new feature designed to make your best offers stand out and be impossible to miss [LinkedIn post]. LinkedIn. https://www.linkedin.com/posts/nataliazacholska_gmail-promotab-dealcards-activity-7384480089373241344-rVPs

Zenk-Möltgen, W., Akdeniz, E., Katsanidou, A., Naßhoven, V., & Balaban, E. (2018). Factors influencing the data sharing behavior of researchers in sociology and political science. Journal of Documentation, 74(5), 1053–1073. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-09-2017-0126

Ziller, C., Loepp, B., Kindermann, B., Köchling, G., & Fadeeva, Y. (2025). Willingness to share personal data online: The role of social influence and sustainability. Technology in Society, 83, 102974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102974

Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. PublicAffairs.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-30

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.